Legal Opinion

State v. Hilton

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1932No. File No. 7259Published

1Opinion of the Court

PER 'CURIAM.

Defendant, Hilton, pleaded guilty in the court below to a charge of transporting liquor. Intervener, the owner of the truck wherein Hilton had transported the liquor, appeared to show cause against the forfeiture of the truck. The state filed an answer to the complaint in intervention, and, after hearing upon the issues so joined, the court made findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment for the forfeiture and sale of the truck in question.

Thereafter intervener moved for new trial, and', after consideration, the trial court vacated the forfeiture judgment and granted a new…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Finch v. MartinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State v. SeversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API