Legal Opinion

Hoefling v. Borsen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 11, 1921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Sac District Court. — M. E. Hutchison, Judge. Suit for specific performance and to quiet title. There was a decree for the plaintiff, and the defendants appeal. —

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, C. J.

— On December 5, 1918, the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant Mrs. Borsen, whereby the plaintiff agreed to buy, and Mrs. Borsen agreed to sell, for the consideration of $10,000, a certain 22-acre farm, the contract to be performed on March 1, 1919. On the latter date, the plaintiff tendered performance, and Mrs. Borsen refused. Her grounds of refusal present the questions for consideration. The only defense set up by her in her original answer was a denial of certain allegations of the petition, which denial, however, was predicated upon her alleged mental ineompetency to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ellsworth College v. CarletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Pring v. SwarmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Wilmes v. TiernaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stolar v. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Trott v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  3. State Ex Rel. Havner v. Associated Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  4. Mastics v. KiralyCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API