Legal Opinion · Dissent

Colgate-Palmolive Company v. Carter-Wallace, Inc., by Change of Name From Carter Products Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 12, 1970No. Patent Appeal 8286Published

1DissentRich, Judge

With respectful deference for the views of the majority, I cannot agree that a reasonable likelihood of confusion does not exist in the concurrent use of PEAK and PEAK PERIOD on the two consumer products here involved — dentifrice and deodorant. These are both low-cost, consumer-purchased, shelf items in the same category of merchandise, sold in the same departments of the same stores for the related uses of personal hygiene, bought by persons of all degrees of intelligence and perspicacity —some of them careless.

Appellant is admittedly the prior user and registrant and the rule is well…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Waldes Kohinoor, Inc. v. Associated Spring CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API