In re Derman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent, Herbert B. Derman, was admitted to practice *111law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on December 21, 1955. At all times relevant to this proceeding, he maintained an office to practice law in the First Judicial Department.
On July 29, 1998, after a jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, respondent was found guilty, inter alia, of conspiracy to manufacture, distribute and possess with intent to manufacture and distribute marihuana in violation of 21 USC § 846. To date, respondent has not been…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- In re ProyectAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993