Legal Opinion

Polk v. Ball

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1945No. 11259PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEE, Circuit Judge.

This case involves a contest between rival claimants of a fund fixed by a jury of freeholders as just compensation for .623 of an acre of land taken in condemnation proceedings by the United States Government.1 The condemned acreage formed part of a tract of 3.39 acres described in a deed from Kent Company, Limited, to the Alexandria & Western Railway Co., in April of 1913.

The determinative question before us is whether the deed conveyed a servitude (right-of-way) or a fee title. If only a servitude was conveyed, appellants are entitled to the fund; but if a fee title…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. John T. Moore Planting Co. v. Morgan's Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  2. Noel Estate, Inc. v. Kansas City Southern & Gulf Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  3. Arkansas Improvement Co. v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  4. Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. v. EllerbeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  5. Natalie Oil Co. v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Veach v. CulpWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Faulk v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  3. R. Faulk, III v. Union Pacific Railroad ComCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  4. Swaby v. Northern Hills Regional Railroad AuthoritySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Malnati v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API