Blount Brothers Realty Co. v. Eilenberger
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
Defendant in error, who was plaintiff below, having suggested by petition for re-hearing that leave be given him to enter a remittitur in the sum of One Thousand Dollars, being the sum allowed for attorney’s fees; and it appearing to the Court that there is no error in the judgment of the court below other than in the allowance of said sum as attorney’s fees as pointed out in Blount Brothers Realty Company v. Eilenberger, 124 So. R. 41;
It is upon consideration of said petition for re-hearing ordered that if the defendant in error, plaintiff below, within ten days from the date upon which the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Mullan v. Bk. of Pasco Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Berns v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Hatch v. TrabueSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Indian Lumber Co. v. RouxSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Millard v. BrannanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.