Hays v. Mouille & Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to the District Court of Allegheny county. This was an action of replevin in favor of M. Mouille & Co., the vendors, against Hays & Black, the agents of the carriers of the goods, for twenty-four boxes or packages of merchandise, in exercise of their right of stoppage in transitu, the goods having been sold by the plaintiffs to Rhodes, of Massillon, Ohio. For further statement of facts, see opinion of his Honor Judge Hepburn.
Read the full summary
Error to the District Court of Allegheny county. This was an action of replevin in favor of M. Mouille & Co., the vendors, against Hays & Black, the agents of the carriers of the goods, for twenty-four boxes or packages of merchandise, in exercise of their right of stoppage in transitu, the goods having been sold by the plaintiffs to Rhodes, of Massillon, Ohio. For further statement of facts, see opinion of his Honor Judge Hepburn. On the trial, the counsel for the defendants requested the court to charge the jury as follows: 1st. That the goods for which the action is brought, being bound by…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Rogers, J.
— After a careful examination of the exceptions taken on the argument, we are decidedly of the opinion the' case is properly ruled, on all the points. As nothing occurs to my mind, calculated to throw additional light on the views, so well expressed ■by Judge Hepburn, the judgment is affirmed, for the reasons given in the charge.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SpencerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Diehl v. McCormickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Pennsylvania R. v. Amer. Oil Works, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Teller & Co. v. American Railway Express Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Fairey Motor Co. v. Harter, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.