Gehlhar v. Konoske

This is a sequel to Gehlhar v. Konoske, 50 N. D. 256, 195 N. W. 558. By that decision it was established that plain •tiff and her two brothers in 1908 entered into a joint enterprise in course of which they acquired certain lands in Stutsman County in this state. Under the arrangement between the plaintiff and her brothers, the brothers farmed the land, and she served as their housekeeper. Plaintiff discontinued her service in November or December, 1915. In the former decision in this case this court held that at this time, to-wit: when plaintiff’s sendees were so discontinued,” she was…