Legal Opinion · Dissent

Becton v. K & L Contractors, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 14, 1992No. 91-763Published

1DissentW. Sharp, Judge

I respectfully dissent. The issue in this case was whether Becton, as personal representative of his deceased wife, Debra, stated a cause of action against appellees, K & L Contractors, Inc., Danis Industries, Inc., and six individuals. K & L was Debra’s employer, Danis owned and controlled K & L, and the individuals were officers, directors and employees of K & L at the time Debra was killed while driving a 70-ton, earth-moving vehicle in the course of her employment. Becton’s problem, which the parties and the trial judge focused on below, as well as on appeal, was whether Becton’s sixth…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Jax LiquorsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. Connelly v. Arrow Air, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Schaap v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. PCB PARTNERSHIP v. City of LargoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Held v. Trafford Realty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API