Legal Opinion
Hess v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 14, 1934No. 320PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*226OPINION
By HORNBECK, PJ.
We need not spend any time in giving a close study on this question but for the purpose of determining the case it will be assumed that the evidence- supports the contention of the plaintiff that the defendant was guilty of: negligence and that such negligence was a proximate cause of the accident and resultant injuries. The real and only question for determination at this time is whether or not the plaintiff was guilty of negligence which was a contributing cause of the accident and the resultant injuries.. The pertinent provision of law is found in §12603, GC, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wosoba v. KenyonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Sawdey v. Producers' Milk Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Bowmaster v. William H. DePree Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Hanno v. Motor Freight Lines, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Chaffee v. DuclosSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sidle v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. State Automobile Mut Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934
- Hangen v. HadfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
- Webb v. StokesOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
- Goldberg v. ChambersOhio Court of Appeals · 1934