Legal Opinion

Miami Transit Co. v. Ford

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 29, 1963No. 62-460PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKDULL, Judge.

The appellees have moved to dismiss this appeal, contending that the notice of appeal was untimely filed.

The record reveals that the case was tried non-jury and a verdict was rendered on April 25, 1962; a motion for new trial was served on opposing counsel on May 4, 1962, but was not filed until May 10, 1962; the notice of appeal was filed on July 12, 1962. It is the contention of the appellees that the appeal was untimely filed, being 72 days after the entry of the final judgment and, therefore, should be dismissed under the authority of State ex rel. Diamond Berk Insurance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Diamond Berk Ins. Agency, Inc. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. Ganzer v. GanzerSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Albert v. CareyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  4. Pilgrim v. MelvinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miami Transit Company v. FordSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  2. Miami Transit Co. v. FordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API