Legal Opinion
State v. Moscato
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 21, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
253 N.J. Super. 253 (1992)
601 A.2d 743
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
FRANK MOSCATO, CITY CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, JOHN CHIAMBRONE, SPRINGBROOK ACRES, INC., AND SLASH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 3, 1991.
Decided January 21, 1992.
Before Judges PRESSLER, SKILLMAN and D'ANNUNZIO.
Victoria Curtis Bramson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney; Victoria Curtis Bramson, on the brief).
Michael Critchley argued the cause for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. ValentinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. FerranteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- State v. VaskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MasonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- In Re Allegations of Violations of Law & Administrative Code by A. Fiore & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- State v. WoodwardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997