State v. Freeman
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wedell, J.:
This is a consolidated appeal of three separate criminal actions. The prosecutions were all based on the same statute (R. S. 25-1714). The appeals all raise the correctness of the ruling-sustaining separate motions to quash the respective informations. The slight difference in the separate informations will be referred to *316later. The motions to quash are similar and will be treated together. R. S. 25-1714 reads:
“Whoever intentionally writes, prints, posts or distributes, or causes to be written, printed, posted, or distributed, a circular or…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- State v. BowmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Wood v. BartlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- City of Wichita v. Wichita Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- People v. DuryeaNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. WonserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- People v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.