Legal Opinion

State v. Freeman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1936No. 32,478; No. 32,479; No. 32,480PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This is a consolidated appeal of three separate criminal actions. The prosecutions were all based on the same statute (R. S. 25-1714). The appeals all raise the correctness of the ruling-sustaining separate motions to quash the respective informations. The slight difference in the separate informations will be referred to *316later. The motions to quash are similar and will be treated together. R. S. 25-1714 reads:

“Whoever intentionally writes, prints, posts or distributes, or causes to be written, printed, posted, or distributed, a circular or…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. State v. BowmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. Wood v. BartlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  5. City of Wichita v. Wichita Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  3. People v. DuryeaNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. WonserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  5. People v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API