Weyerhaeuser v. Hoyt
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT. OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. The facts, which involve the construction of the Northern Pacific Land Grant Acts, are stated, in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court 1
219 U.S. 380 (1911)
WEYERHAEUSER
v.
HOYT.
No. 24.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued April 27, 28, 1910.
Reargument December 19, 1910.
Reargued January 19, 20, 1911.
Decided February 20, 1911.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Mr. Charles W. Bunn and Mr. Frank B. Kellogg, with whom Mr. Stiles W. Burr was on the brief, for appellants in No. 24 and appellees in No. 12.
Mr. Charles W. Bunn for plaintiffs in error in No. 181.
Mr. M.H. Stanford for appellees in No. 24 and appellants in No. 12.
Mr. P.B. Gorman for defendant in error in No. 181.[1]
Restored to docket for…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · White; Dissent.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Shepley v. CowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Campbell v. WeyerhaeuserSupreme Court of the United States · 1911