Legal Opinion · Dissent

Elizabethtown Water Co. v. New Jersey Board of Public Utilities

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 29, 1987Published

1DissentO’Hern, J.

I believe that the correct resolution of the issues before us is to have the Board of Public Utilities Commissioners (BPU or Board) reconsider its rate resolution in accordance with the principles that the Court adopts. This is the basic approach that we have taken in other ratemaking cases, and it more accurately reflects the appropriate role of the courts in this essentially legislative process of ratemaking.

This case is not readily resolved by labeling the issue as one of retroactive ratemaking. What we basically have here is an administrative response to an extraordinary and nonrecurring…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Bergen Pines County Hospital v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Riverside General Hospital v. New Jersey Hospital Rate Setting CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. New Jersey Bell Telephone Company v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. In Re Proposed Increased Intrastate Industrial Sand RatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API