Legal Opinion

People v. Haab

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932No. Docket No. 204, Calendar No. 36,572PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Defendant was convicted of bastardy, and prosecutes review by appeal in the nature of certiorari.

At the trial Miss Brandt, the complaining witness, in answer to questions, gave details not mentioned at the examination before the magistrate, and defendant was not permitted to so show by the transcript of the evidence returned. The evidence, taken before the magistrate, is in the record, and we find nothing therein tending to impeach her testimony at the trial, and, therefore, pass the point without further comment.

Miss Brandt was 23 years of age, and her father testified, in behalf of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Olson v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. State v. DanforthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
  3. Anderson v. AupperleOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. People v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. People v. GillMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Almeida v. CorreaHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Green v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. HelmsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  3. Schigur v. KeckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Almeida v. CorreaHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Kessler v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API