Legal Opinion
Farrakhan-Muhammad v. Oliver
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 3, 2017No. 16-1445UnpublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT **
Bobby R. Baldock Circuit Judge
Petitioner Q. Ili-Yaas Farrakhan-Muhammad, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, brought this petition for a writ of habe-as corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, alleging violations of his constitutional due process rights in connection with prison disciplinary proceedings. During those proceed- mgs, the Disciplinary Hearing Officer (DHO) found him guilty of assaulting another inmate by throwing an unknown clear liquid at that inmate. The DHO sanctioned Petitioner with 27 days’ loss of good conduct time, 30 days’ disciplinary segregation, and 60…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gwinn v. AwmillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown v. JohnstonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
- Earp v. StarDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
- Garcia-Garcia v. RickardDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2018
- Hanson v. BakerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
- Harris v. MarukaDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.