Legal Opinion
State v. Hatt
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided January 18, 2002No. 86,063, 86,064PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wahl, J.:
Aaron Hatt appeals his sentence imposed following his conviction of two counts of forgery.
In June 2000, Hatt entered a plea of nolo contendere to two counts of forgery in cases Nos. 00 CR 424 and 00 CR 458. In return, the State agreed to dismiss the remaining charges in both cases.
Hatt’s presentence investigation (PSI) report showed he had nine prior convictions. He had a California burglary conviction in 1995, person felony, and Kansas theft, nonperson felony, and giving a worthless check, misdemeanor, convictions in 1996. The source of information regarding these three convictions…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Shannon Wayne TigheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- State v. GouldSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- State v. HittSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- State v. SchowSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. HobbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- State v. WeltyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.