A. E. Staley Manufacturing Company v. Staley Milling Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge.
A factual controversy is the chief factor in this appeal resting upon a prolix record. After carefully canvassing that five volume transcript of evidence containing roughly 3693 printed pages encompassing testimony of 122 witnesses, 192 depositions and a welter of exhibits, it is our opinion that the findings of fact, vigorously assailed by "defendant, and entered below, must be left undisturbed. This is simply not an instance of where some critical finding, or findings, of fact are clearly erroneous. United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 1948, 333 U.S. 364, 395,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Oregon State Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Independent Nail & Packing Co., Inc. v. Stronghold Screw Products, IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- T & T Manufacturing Co. v. A. T. Cross Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1978
- Gaston's White River Resort v. RushDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1988
- Red Devil Tools v. Tip Top Brush Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- The Seven-Up Company v. O-So Grape Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1959
- HA Friend and Company v. Friend and CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.