Legal Opinion
West Washington Properties v. Department of Transportation
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 10, 2012No. B233295PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BIGELOW, P. J.
This case concerns an advertising display California’s Department of Transportation (Caltrans) found was in violation of the Outdoor Advertising Act, Business and Professions Code section 5200 et seq. (the Act).1 The owner of the display, West Washington Properties, LLC (West Washington), argued equitable estoppel and laches barred the agency from *1140enforcing the Act, or formed the basis of an inverse condemnation claim. The trial court rejected these arguments. We affirm the trial court judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
We adopt some of the background from our…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re Marriage of CornejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Feduniak v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Traverso v. People Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schafer v. City of Los Angeles CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
- J. Arthur Props., II, LLC v. City of San Jose, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- D'Egidio v. City of Santa ClaritaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- J. Arthur Properties, II, LLC v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Kretowicz v. Cal. Coastal Commission CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.