Legal Opinion

Berry v. Tide Water Associated Oil Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 18, 1951No. 13285PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

Brought to cancel, and remove the cloud of, an “unless” oil, gas and mineral lease as to a portion of the land leased which had been assigned to the defendants, the suit sought a decree adjudging that, because of their failure to drill on or develop their assigned portion, the lease as to it had terminated and was of no . further effect.

Plaintiffs’ primary claim was that, under Mississippi law, upon the assignment of the segregated portion of the land, it became in effect a separate lease, with the result that instead, as before, of one producing well within the primary…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Waggoner Estate v. Sigler Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. Guffey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. BarkerTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Calcote v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cameron v. LebowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  2. Superior Oil Co. v. Devon Corp.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1978
  3. Hurley Enterprises, Inc. v. Sun Gas Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1982
  4. Mrs. E. P. Blanton v. Mrs. Maggie MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  5. Schock v. GilpinDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API