Berles v. Adsit
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Belator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to set aside her default, entered in a garnishee suit because ■of her refusal to submit to an examination. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Montgomery,- J.
An action was commenced in the circuit court for the county of Kent by the Peninsular Stove Company, as plaintiff, against Joseph Berles. Garnishee proceedings were also instituted against Theresa*496Berles, the relator, who is the wife of Joseph Berles. Judgment was rendered against the principal defendant. The affidavit for a writ of garnishment set forth that the-garnishee defendant had property, money, goods, chattels,, and effects in her hands and under her control, belonging to the principal defendant, Joseph Berles, which she held by a conveyance or title that was void as to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- DeFarges v. Ryland & BrooksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1891
- Niland v. KalishNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Thompson v. Silvers & HoffmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hagerman v. WigentMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Frankenthal v. SolomonsonWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Stalcup v. JepsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
- Allen-West Commission Co. v. GrumblesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1908
- Commercial Credit Co. v. McReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934