Legal Opinion

United States v. Shafer

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 29, 1974No. CR 74-165PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BATTISTI, Chief Judge.

Defendants have moved this Court for a judgment of acquittal, pursuant to the provisions of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29(a). For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted as to each of the eight defendants.

I. STANDARD FOR DECIDING RULE 29(a) MOTIONS.

Rule 29(a) states that, “The court on motion of a defendant or of its own motion shall order the entry of judgment of acquittal of one or more offenses charged in the indictment or information after the evidence on either side is closed if the evidence is insufficient to sustain a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  3. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Mortensen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Earl R. Cephus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. DemikCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  2. Krause v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Recognition Equipment Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1989
  4. State v. OviedoOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Krause v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API