Legal Opinion

Spahalic v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 14, 2003No. 2D02-3231Published

1Opinion of the Court

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Zenun Spahalic appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to clarify sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal *597Procedure 3.800(a). Spahalie pleaded nolo contendere to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment.

In his motion Spahalie alleged that when the trial court orally pronounced the sentence, it did not state that the term of imprisonment was a minimum mandatory term pursuant to section 775.087(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2000). Spahalie asked that the trial court clarify the sentence and notify the Department…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SeslerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Elbert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API