Globe Granite Co. v. Clements
Supreme Court of Vermont
Assumpsit in the common counts. Plea in offset. Heard on the report of a referee at the March Term, 1917, Washington County, Wilson, J., presiding. Judgment for plaintiff. Both parties excepted. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
This is an action of contract, in the form of general assumpsit. The plaintiff filed a specification, of a skeleton character, referring to various contracts for monuments, and claiming a balance of $449. The defendant, among other pleas, filed a plea in offset in the general counts in assumpsit, and the cause was referred. Before the referee the defendant filed a specification under his plea in offset. This specification was also of a skeleton character. It contained a claim with reference to a certain contract 39888 so called, not one of the contracts to which the plaintiff’s specification…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Melby v. D. M. Osborne & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Patterson's Admr. v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
- Dana v. McClureSupreme Court of Vermont · 1867
- Pinney v. AndrusSupreme Court of Vermont · 1869
- Hobart v. YoungSupreme Court of Vermont · 1891
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Neill v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Town of Orange v. City of BarreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- Soulia v. StrattonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
- Currier v. AmesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939