Barriga Figueroa v. Prieto Mariscal
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
González, J
¶ 1 Washington law extends work product protection to statements made by an insured to an insurer following an accident in light of the specific parties involved and the expectations of those parties. We must decide if that protection applies here, where the insured has gained the status of insured by statute, rather than by contract. We hold it does. We affirm the Court of Appeals and remand to the trial court for a new trial.
FACTS
¶ 2 On October 30, 2013, Consuelo Prieto Mariscal was driving her minivan in Pasco, Washington, with her daughter. There were vehicles, including an…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. TharpWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Brown v. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1983
- Thomas v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Todd Mclaughlin v. Travelers Commercial Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Bowles v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- Peoples v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- Robertson v. DornDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington, V. Shamarr D. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.