Legal Opinion

Pope & Talbot, Inc., and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 6, 1999No. 97-71359PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge THOMPSON; Dissent by Judge NOONAN.

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge;

The taxpayer Pope & Talbot, Inc. (“Pope & Talbot”) appeals the tax court’s decision under 26 U.S.C. § 311(d)(1) determining the gain Pope & Talbot was required to recognize when it distributed appreciated property to a limited partnership, which in turn distributed limited partnership interests to the Pope & Talbot shareholders. The tax court calculated the fair market value of the distributed property by determining what a willing buyer would have paid a willing seller in a hypothetical sale of the property…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. General Utilities & Operating Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Estate of Jung v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  4. Estate of Louis F. Bonner, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. Amerada Hess Corp. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Esgar Corp. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  2. Pope Res., LP v. Wash. State Dep't of Natural Res.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
  3. S. Tulsa Pathology Lab. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002
  4. Doe v. Colorado Community College SystemDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020
  5. Dovid & Marcia L. Goldfarb v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API