Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Bubonics

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided August 8, 1994No. NMCM 92 2014PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLISON, Senior Judge:

The principal issue in this appeal from a special court-martial conviction is whether the appellant’s pretrial confession should have been suppressed because it was obtained through the use of coercion, unlawful influence, or unlawful inducement. We conclude that it was and should have been suppressed. Accordingly, we set aside the findings and sentence and authorize a rehearing.

Background

Prior to trial the appellant confessed to breaking into another Sailor’s locker and stealing personal property. The appellant was subsequently charged with larceny of a wallet,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. TempiaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  3. United States v. RemaiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  4. United States v. MongeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  5. United States v. GrootersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  2. United States v. BubonicsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  3. United States v. Flores-GalarzaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
  4. United States v. DoucetNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  5. United States v. EllisNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API