Legal Opinion

Judge v. Ohm

California Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1891No. 14418PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to dismiss an appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

Motion to dismiss appeal.

It appears by the certificate of the county clerk of the city and county of San Francisco that appellant filed her notice of appeal upon the fifth day of January, 1891, *135and her undertaking on appeal upon the tenth day oí the same month; that the bill of exceptions was settled upon the second day of January, 1891, and was filed the day following.

A motion to dismiss the appeal was made April 15, 1891, upon the ground that no transcript had been filed within the time prescribed by the rules of this court.

Although the time to file the transcript in the cause had…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scott v. LandisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API