Legal Opinion

Maddox v. Howard Hughes Corp.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 2019No. 2019-C-0135Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Rosemary Ledet

This is a tort suit. The Relator, The Howard Hughes Corporation ("Howard Hughes"), filed an application for supervisory writ, seeking review of the trial court's judgment denying its motion for summary judgment. In accordance with the requirements of La. C.C.P. art. 966(H),1 we ordered additional briefing by the parties and heard oral arguments. For the reasons that follow, we grant Howard Hughes' writ application, reverse the trial court's ruling denying its summary judgment motion, and render summary judgment dismissing Ms. Maddox's claims against it.

FACTUAL AND…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Samaha v. RauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  3. Spott v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  4. Day v. National US Radiator CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
  5. Roadrunner Transportation Systems v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API