Legal Opinion

The Europa

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided July 5, 1902No. 988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit for collision.

1Opinion of the Court

TOUDMIN, District Judge.

The facts of this case, as shown by the evidence, are, in substance, that one of the libelants owned the sloop for the loss of which this suit is brought. The sloop was between 20 and 25 feet long, 9 or 10 feet beam, and rigged with mainsail and jib and with such other apparel, etc., as was suitable to her *697trade, which was principally that of oystering. She had aboard the other two libelants, who composed the entire crew. One of them was captain and the other mate. The sloop was at the time of the collision without cargo. About io o’clock on the morning of April 13,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Propeller Monticello v. MollisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. The PotomacSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. The "Illinois."Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. The" Adriatic"Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Lewis v. TrantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The Buenos AiresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  2. Southern S. S. Co. v. RandolphDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. West India Oil Co. v. Compania Transatlantica De BarcelonaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API