Legal Opinion

Austin v. Heath

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 20, 1929No. 27609PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

Plaintiff sues for the value of 20 bales of cotton stored in defendant’s warehouse and destroyed by fire of unknown origin during the night of Sunday, October 14, 1923.

As the defendant, as bailee of the cotton, has shown that the cotton was destroyed by an overwhelming force, the burden of proof is on plaintiff to show that the fire originated or was permitted to spread through some fault or negligence on the part of defendant. McCullom v. Porter, 17 La. Ann. 89; Scott v. Sample, 148 La. 627, 87 So. 478.

The evidence in this case shows that the defendant owned a small tin-inclosed ware house…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scott v. SampleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  2. McCullom v. PorterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1865

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fuchs Murane v. GoeWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Royal Ins. Co. v. Collard Motors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Leigh v. Johnson-Evans MotorsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Aircraft Sales & Service, Inc. v. BramlettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Poydras Fruit Co. v. Weinberger Banana Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API