Legal Opinion

Richards v. Richards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 29, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.), entered on or about May 26,1995, which, in an action for divorce, determined that plaintiff wife is not barred from equitable distribution of defendant husband’s pension and retirement plans as a result of a prenuptial agreement in which she waived any claim thereto, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We are in accord with the view expressed by the United States District Court, Southern District of New York in Hurwitz v Sher (789 F Supp 134, 137 [citing Treasury Regulation (26 CFR) § 1.401 (a)-20], affd for other reasons 982 F2d…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hurwitz v. SherDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Strong v. DubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Edmonds v. EdmondsNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Wiltshire v. CitibankNew York Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API