Legal Opinion

Shell Oil Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 21, 1995No. Nos. 92-1634, 93-1762PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.

ROGERS, Circuit Judge:

Petitioners in these consolidated cases challenge an order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission concerning access to an oil pipeline system on the Outer Continental Shelf. Applying the “open and nondiscriminatory access” provision of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (“OCSLA”), 43 U.S.C. § 1334(f) (1988), the Commission ruled that the Bonito Pipe Line Company must provide Shell Oil Company with access and transportation service on its pipeline. Petitioner Pennzoil Exploration and Production Company,1 which…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Company Shell Pipe Line Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Pennzoil Exploration and Production Company, Intervenors. Pennzoil Exploration and Production Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Shell Oil Company Shell Pipe Line Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. BlochDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API