Ollman v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
PADOVANO, Judge.
Curtis Oilman, the defendant, appeals his convictions for driving under the influence, a felony offense as charged, and driving with a suspended license. He contends that he was denied his constitutional right of self-representation under Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975). We agree that the trial court failed to apply the correct standard in evaluating the defendant’s request to proceed without counsel. Therefore we reverse.
As the Florida Supreme Court recently explained in State v. Bowen, 22 Fla. L. Weekly S208, — So.2d - [1997 WL…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BowenSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Hughes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- Neal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014