Legal Opinion

City of Auburn v. Town of Sennett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 23, 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Report of Referees unanimously confirmed, without costs, and judgment granted in favor of petitioner adjudging that the proposed annexation is in the over-all public interest. Memorandum: The sole issue in this proceeding is whether the proposed annexation to the City of Auburn of intervenor’s property situated in the Town of Sennett is in the “over-all public interest” (General Municipal Law, § 712, subd 1). The territory proposed to be annexed consists of 15 lots in the Town of Sennett comprising approximately 2.4 acres of land. This area is contiguous to land in the City of Auburn…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Common Council v. Town Board of JohnstownNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. City of Saratoga Springs v. Town of GreenfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. Town Board of Brighton v. City Council of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Board of Trustees of Pomona v. Town of RamapoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Caruso v. MossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. City of Jamestown v. Town of EllicottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Village of Saugerties v. Town of SaugertiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API