Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ming Tung v. China Buddhist Ass'n

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 2016PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order of the Appellate Division affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated by Justice Judith J. Gische at the Appellate Division, First Department (124 AD3d 13 [2014]), and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary.

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Ming Tung v. China Buddhist Assn.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Queens Branch of the Bhuvaneshwar Mandir, Inc. v. ShermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Bronx Islamic Socy., Inc. v. AllyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  3. Chih-Chen Ma v. Wei Li WangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
  4. People v. WoodwardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  5. Reiner v. PanethDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API