Legal Opinion
Milano v. Sheridan Trust & Savings Bank
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 29, 1926No. Gen. No. 30,803PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely
delivered the opinion of the court.
Plaintiffs sought to recover $2,250 with interest and upon trial by the court, upon stipulated facts, had judgment for $7.74, from which they appeal, claiming that under the facts and law they are entitled to the entire amount claimed in their declaration.
Plaintiffs are employees of L. Klein & Company, which conduct a department store in Chicago. They are organized in an association known as “L. Klein Employes’ Savings and Loan Association.” The defeudant bank was engaged in the duties usual and in- . cident to banking in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sims v. . U.S. Trust Co. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Hathaway v. . County of DelawareNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Graham v. Southington Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Drumm Construction Co. v. ForbesIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Bristol Knife Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bonded Financial Services, Inc., Debtor-Appellant v. European American BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Jo Daviess Services, Inc. v. Elizabeth State Bank, an Illinois State Chartered BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Douglass v. WonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Main Belting Co. v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- People ex rel. Nelson v. Peoples Loan & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.