Legal Opinion

Munzer v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1904Published

Appeal by the defendant, The Interurban Street Railway Company, from- a judgment of the City Court of the city of iSTew York, entered in favor of the -plaintiff upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order denying said defendant’s motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.

The action was brought against the defendant-appellant and one Comstock to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the joint negligence of said defendants in permitting a collision to occur between a horse and wagon controlled by Comstock and a car of the railway company, in which the plaintiff was a passenger. The jury found a verdict against the railroad company only. The horse and wagon were being driven west through Sixty-third street as the car on Madison avenue approached said street in its northerly course. There was a puddle…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Griffen v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Goodkind v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API