Legal Opinion

Joseph F. Schanne v. Bioren Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1930No. Appeal 111PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

Under the Practice Act of 1915, P. L. 483, and its amendments, judgment may not be entered for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in an action of trespass: Smith v. Wertheimer, 76 Pa. Superior Ct. 210; Stern v. Lancaster, 79 Pa. Superior Ct. 27; Bartoe v. Guckert, 158 Pa. 124. Any rule of court to the contrary is invalid and should be revoked: Smith v. Wertheimer, supra. The error is a basic one, appearing on the face of the record, and will be corrected in this court even though the point was not raised in the court below.

To avoid a second error on the trial we…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. WertheimerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Bartoe v. GuckertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Vollmer v. NewburgerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Stern v. LancasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Schanne v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API