Legal Opinion

General Tanning Corp. v. Consolidated Sewing Machine & Supply Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1933Published

1Opinion of the CourtSteinbrink, J.

From the complaint it appears that in April, 1927, the parties hereto entered into an agreement under the terms of which plaintiff agreed to deliver to defendant 24,000 belts of a certain description, the price being thirty cents for each belt. Defendant agreed to accept 2,000 belts a month. Pursuant to the agreement plaintiff delivered 7,030 belts. Defendant paid for the first 3,000 belts, but on August 25, 1927, refused to pay for the remaining ones on the ground that they were imperfect and not according to sample, and refused to accept any further deliveries. Plaintiff thereupon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Secor v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Pakas v. . HollingsheadNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. C. Bahnsen & Co. v. GerstNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API