Legal Opinion

Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. Renegotiation Board

United States Tax Court

Decided April 24, 1969No. Docket No. 1055-RPublished

Motion to strike paragraphs in a petition designed to show Renegotiation Board acted arbitrarily in determining excess profits and acted erroneously with respect to credit for State taxes is granted on the ground that this Court lacks jurisdiction to review the Board's proceedings and lacks jurisdiction to determine tax credits.

1Opinion of the Court

Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation, Petitioner v. Renegotiation Board, Respondent

Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. Renegotiation Board

Docket No. 1055-R

United States Tax Court

52 T.C. 152; 1969 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 143;

April 24, 1969, Filed

Motion to strike paragraphs in a petition designed to show Renegotiation Board acted arbitrarily in determining excess profits and acted erroneously with respect to credit for State taxes is granted on the ground that this Court lacks jurisdiction to review the Board's proceedings and lacks jurisdiction to determine tax credits.

Robert A. Trevisani and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Cohen v. Secretary of WarUnited States Tax Court · 1946
  3. Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc. v. StimsonUnited States Tax Court · 1948
  4. Rosner v. War Contracts Price Adjustment BoardUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  5. Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. Renegotiation BoardUnited States Tax Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API