Palethorp v. Palethorp
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 116, Jan. T., 1899, by defendants, from decree of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., June T., 1894, No. 1702, on bill in equity. Bill in equity for partition. McCarthy, J., filed the following opinion: EINDINGS OE EACTS. The following facts are clearly established by the bill, answer and proofs, namely: 1. John II.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 116, Jan. T., 1899, by defendants, from decree of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., June T., 1894, No. 1702, on bill in equity. Bill in equity for partition. McCarthy, J., filed the following opinion: EINDINGS OE EACTS. The following facts are clearly established by the bill, answer and proofs, namely: 1. John II. Palethorp, of the city of Philadelphia, at the time of his decease, was seized in his demesne as of fee of fourteen parcels of real estate situate in the city of Philadelphia and state of Pennsylvania, and of one additional parcel of real estate situate in Bucks county,…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
After a careful examination of the able argument of the counsel for the appellants, we are constrained to say that it has not convinced us of any error in the findings of facts and conclusions of law contained in the opinion of the learned court below, and we therefore affirm the decree on the opinion.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Lincoln v. AfricaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Hoog v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Dunshee v. DunsheeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Shields v. AitkenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912