Legal Opinion

Earp v. Florida Department of Commerce Industrial Relations Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 2, 1970No. 70-550PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McNULTY, Judge.

Petitioner was fired from her employment and sought unemployment benefits pursuant to Ch. 443, F.S.A. Her claim for such benefits was denied by respondents for the stated reason that she was guilty of “misconduct” within the meaning of 443.06, F.S.A. She seeks review by certiorari.

Petitioner’s employer had procedural standards for the purchase of merchandise by employees. The record reflects that petitioner repeatedly made purchases without complying with these procedures. Admittedly, although these procedures were violated by other employees, others did not violate them as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Spaulding v. Florida Industrial CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re CollingsworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Shacklett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Klein v. CHR Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Valparaiso Bank & Trust Co. v. Florida Department of Labor & Employment Security, Division of Employment SecurityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API