Earp v. Florida Department of Commerce Industrial Relations Commission
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
McNULTY, Judge.
Petitioner was fired from her employment and sought unemployment benefits pursuant to Ch. 443, F.S.A. Her claim for such benefits was denied by respondents for the stated reason that she was guilty of “misconduct” within the meaning of 443.06, F.S.A. She seeks review by certiorari.
Petitioner’s employer had procedural standards for the purchase of merchandise by employees. The record reflects that petitioner repeatedly made purchases without complying with these procedures. Admittedly, although these procedures were violated by other employees, others did not violate them as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Spaulding v. Florida Industrial CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re CollingsworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Shacklett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Klein v. CHR Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Valparaiso Bank & Trust Co. v. Florida Department of Labor & Employment Security, Division of Employment SecurityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979