North Carolina Right to Life Committee Fund for Independent Political Expenditures v. Leake
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge TRAXLER and Judge JONES joined.
OPINION
MICHAEL, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiffs, a former candidate for the North Carolina Supreme Court and two *432political action committees, challenge the constitutionality of three provisions of North Carolina’s Judicial Campaign Reform Act, N.C. Sess. Laws 2002-158, codified at N.C. Gen.Stat. § 163-278.61 et seq. (the Act). The Act, which became law in 2002, creates a system of voluntary public financing for judicial candidates at the appellate level. The district court denied the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Scott v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Iowa Right To Life Committee v. Megan TookerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Vermont Right to Life Committee, Inc. v. SorrellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Lux v. JuddCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Stop Reckless Economic Instability Caused by Democrats v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.