Stewart v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Judge.
Conviction for murder; punishment, death.
We note in their order appellant’s bills of exception. He complains of the refusal of a continuance sought because of his alleged illness and weakness, of such nature as to render him incapable of “coherently following the progress of the trial or of aiding his attorneys, in discussion of facts which might be testified to in said cause.” This bill of exception is qualified to show, first, that it was a second application, and, second, that it appeared that the night before the call of the case for trial appellant had slashed his arm…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Cortez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Blocker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Ruiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Wechsler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Fernandez v. BetoDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1968
- Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Mainer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.