Legal Opinion

Roark v. Graves

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 18, 1997No. 76,511PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, C.J.:

This is a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action by certain inmates of the Norton Correctional Facility challenging the assessment of monthly service fees against them for the administration of their trust accounts pursuant to K.A.R. 44-5-115(a) (1996 Supp.) on the grounds that it is violative of their due process rights and the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. The district court upheld the assessment of the fees, and plaintiffs appeal therefrom.

The statute from which the regulation arises is K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 75-52,139,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. State v. DurrantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  4. Levier v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. In re ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SebeliusDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  2. Weinlood v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. Owens v. SebeliusDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2005
  4. Jacklovich v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API