Finch v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNISH, Judge:
The appellants appeal their convictions rendered in the District Court of Muskogee County for Knowingly Concealing Stolen Property. All cases were tried to the court at one time. Eugene Finch was convicted in CRF-78-408 and CRF-78-409; Vesta Mae Finch was convicted in CRF-79-12 and CRF-79-13. In each of the cases the appellants both received concurrent five-year sentences with four years suspended.
The appellants’ first three propositions deal with the questions of whether the war-rantless arrest of Eugene Finch violated his constitutional rights; and whether the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cardwell v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. LodermeierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Byrd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Champeau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
- People v. MorganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.