Marquez v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The petitioner, Julian Marquez, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, he claims that the habeas court (1) abused its discretion by denying his petition for certification to appeal, and (2) improperly concluded that the alleged conduct of the prosecutor in the underlying criminal proceeding did not violate the petitioner's right to due process and a fair trial. We conclude that the habeas court did not abuse its discretion in denying the petition for certification to appeal, and, accordingly, dismiss the appeal.
The following…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. FloydSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. OuelletteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marquez v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Rosa v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Marquez v. BarroneDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Marquez v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019