Commonwealth v. MacDonald
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
*1006The defendant was originally placed on probation by a District Court judge (sentencing judge). The conditions of probation on the probation form signed by the defendant do not mirror those on the docket. The docket indicates that a condition of probation imposed by the sentencing judge was that the defendant “stay away.” The form the defendant signed contained written conditions of probation prepared by a probation officer and included the requirement that he “stay away from [the victim], no contact.” Thus, the probation form included a “no contact” requirement, whereas the docket required…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Barry v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. MattosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hacker, Anthony WayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Boston Property Exchange Transfer Co. v. IantoscaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Taylor v. BeaudryMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. PachecoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- Duggan v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.