Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. MacDonald

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 5, 2001PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1006The defendant was originally placed on probation by a District Court judge (sentencing judge). The conditions of probation on the probation form signed by the defendant do not mirror those on the docket. The docket indicates that a condition of probation imposed by the sentencing judge was that the defendant “stay away.” The form the defendant signed contained written conditions of probation prepared by a probation officer and included the requirement that he “stay away from [the victim], no contact.” Thus, the probation form included a “no contact” requirement, whereas the docket required…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barry v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. MattosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hacker, Anthony WayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  2. Boston Property Exchange Transfer Co. v. IantoscaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  3. Taylor v. BeaudryMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. PachecoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  5. Duggan v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API